Sunday, October 29, 2006

More Ford Thuggery?

This is a disturbing video:



As described by Liz Garrigan at the Nashville Scene:
On this video, a Ford staffer can be heard saying, "That fucking guy is filming you," at which point another Ford campaign staffer manhandles a GOP video tracker's camera in a public parking lot.

Anyone know the name of the brown-shirted butch-acting person appearing to touch the cameraman? I think it's a woman, but I'm not sure.

Here's the Tennessee Republican Party presser on the incident.

This is the way some campaign people act when their candidate is behind in the polls and dropping.

UPDATE: According to a commenter, the person in the brown outfit is one Carol Andrews, communications director for Junior.

Tennessean Carol Andrews is the campaign's communications director. A veteran of political, non-profit and corporate communications efforts for concerns across the nation, Ms. Andrews most recently served as press secretary to Gov. Christine Gregoire of Washington state. Andrews directed communications in Tennessee for the presidential campaign of General Wes Clark and was press secretary to former Congressman Bob Clement during his U.S. Senate race in 2002. She also worked with the Ann Coulter for Mayor campaign.

While vice president for communications of political media firm Fletcher Rowley Chao Inc., she produced media projects for Congressmen Charlie Melancon of Louisiana and Lincoln Davis of Tennessee, among dozens of campaigns and elected officials on local, state and federal levels.

Ms. Andrews is a former communications coordinator for the Tennessee State Employees Association, and a former news editor for The Lebanon Democrat.

A recent press release of hers gives her telephone numbers, in case anyone wants to ask her questions: 615.244.6161 or 615.347.0193.

UPDATE: Not as an accusation, but as a warning, I am posting the Tennessee criminal statute on assault:

39-13-101. Assault.

(a) A person commits assault who:
(1)Intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another;
(2)Intentionally or knowingly causes another to reasonably fear imminent bodily injury; or
(3) Intentionally or knowingly causes physical contact with another and a reasonable person would regard the contact as extremely offensive or provocative.

(b) (1) Assault is a Class A misdemeanor unless the offense is committed under subdivision (a)(3), in which event assault is a Class B misdemeanor....

Saturday, October 28, 2006

Father’s lobbying clients help Ford

I couldn't just add the above-titled investigative piece in The (Nashville) City Paper Online to my Very Important Posts because the City Paper doesn't have an RSS feed yet; but I bring you the link to the article itself and a succulent paragraph pointed out by journalist and blogger Adam Kleinheider at ABC affiliate WKRN-TV in Nashville:
At least one lobbyist with the Harold Ford Group has also contributed heavily to Ford Jr.’s political efforts. Michelle Roberts, an attorney for Ford Sr.’s lobbying shop, has given just over $14,000 to Ford Jr.’s campaign accounts since 1998, with her employer listed alternately as “The Ford Group” or “Harold Ford and Co.” and her occupation either as “attorney” or “corporate counsel.” In addition, Roberts appears as a lobbyist on registration forms for Community Oncology Alliance and The West Clinic.

Gosh, could that be the same Michelle Roberts who co-owns a pied-à-terre with Harold Ford, Sr., in Memphis? My mind reels at the possibilities....

Harold Ford Panties

Ladies, now you can carry Harold Ford, Jr., next to your "heart" by purchasing the Harold Ford, Jr., Classic Thong from a cool shop on Cafe Press, Political Musing.


Click the thong to get a better read on the logo.

Memphis dwellers will love the special section on Memphis Politics. Here are some of the graphics you can put on clothing and other items:

The Formula

A new piece in Slate online magazine gives some hope for American energy independence based on "the Fischer-Tropsch process, a chemical technique to convert natural gas and coal into liquid fuels, ... [u]sed by the Nazis to make oil from coal during World War II."

Made me think of that movie The Formula with Marlon Brando.

Yardbirds Documentary

Yes, there is life beyond politics; and my friend SteveAudio -- guitarist, studio engineer, and blogger among the California beautiful people -- is one of the best filters on earth for the music of the Baby Boomer Generation.

Steve comes up with some fabulous finds. His latest is a three-part video documentary on the extremely seminal 60's band, the Yardbirds. Give Steve a visit and watch the show.

Thursday, October 26, 2006

Tennessee Electioneering Laws

Here are three more state statutes I reviewed in conjunction with things that have come up during the current election campaigns in Tennessee:

2-19-142. Knowingly publishing false campaign literature.

It is a Class C misdemeanor for any person to publish or distribute or cause to be published or distributed any campaign literature in opposition to any candidate in any election if such person knows that any such statement, charge, allegation, or other matter contained therein with respect to such candidate is false.

2-19-116. Misrepresentations on campaign literature or sample ballots - Penalty.

(a) No person shall print or cause to be printed or assist in the distribution or transportation of any facsimile of an official ballot, any unofficial sample ballot, writing, pamphlet, paper, photograph or other printed material which contains the endorsement of a particular candidate, group of candidates or proposition by an organization, group, candidate or other individual, whether existent or not, with the intent that the person receiving such printed material mistakenly believe that the endorsement of such candidate, candidates or proposition was made by an organization, group, candidate or entity other than the one or ones appearing on the printed material.
(b) A violation of this section is a Class C misdemeanor.

2-19-120. Political communications, advertising and solicitations - Contents - Applicability - Penalties.

(a) Whenever any person makes an expenditure for the purpose of financing a communication that expressly advocates the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate, as defined by § 2-10-102, or that solicits any contribution, through any broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine, outdoor advertising facility, poster, yard sign, direct mailing or any other form of general public political advertising, a disclaimer meeting the requirements of subdivision (a)(1), (2), (3) or (4) shall appear and be presented in a clear and conspicuous manner to give the reader, observer or listener adequate notice of the identity of persons who paid for and, where required, who authorized the communication. Such person is not required to place the disclaimer on the front face or page of any such material, as long as a disclaimer appears within the communication, except on communications, such as billboards, that contain only a front face.
(1) Such communication, including any solicitation, if paid for and authorized by a candidate, an authorized committee of a candidate, or its agent shall clearly state that the communication has been paid for by the authorized political committee, in addition to the identity of the person who is the head of such committee, or the identity of the treasurer of such committee.
(2) Such communication, including any solicitation, if authorized by a candidate, an authorized committee of a candidate or an agent thereof, but paid for by any other person, shall clearly state that the communication is paid for by such other person and is authorized by such candidate, authorized committee or agent.
(3) Such communication, including any solicitation, if made on behalf of or in opposition to a candidate, but paid for by any other person and not authorized by a candidate, authorized committee of a candidate or its agent, shall clearly state that the communication has been paid for by such person and is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
(4) (A) For solicitations directed to the general public on behalf of a political committee which is not an authorized committee of a candidate, such solicitation shall clearly state the full name of the person who paid for the communication.
(B) For purposes of this section, whenever a separate segregated fund solicits contributions to the fund from those persons it may solicit, such communication shall not be considered a form of general public advertising. Such advertisements shall also include the name of the printer of such advertisement, and the identity of the person who paid for the advertisement.
(b) (1) [Deleted by 2004 amendment.]
(2) [Deleted by 2004 amendment.]
(3) The requirements of this section do not apply to bumper stickers, pins, buttons, pens, novelties, and similar small items upon which the disclaimer cannot be conveniently printed.
(c) A violation of this section is a Class C misdemeanor.

Monday, October 23, 2006

Social Security at 62 — or wait?

An excellent piece by John W. Schoen of MSNBC's Answer Desk: "Start collecting Social Security at 62 — or wait? -- Retiring early means more payments — but a smaller check for life."
A lot of Answer Desk readers approaching retirement — including more than 70 million baby boomers — are stumped when it comes to a key question concerning Social Security benefits.
If you're a Boomer, you know you want to read the whole thing.

Sunday, October 22, 2006

Harold Ford Crashes at Airport

This raw footage was shot Friday on the Wilson Air runway in Memphis:



Thanks to Thaddeus Matthews' post, "Has Harold Jr. Finally Proved That He Is A True Ford?"
Many have thought that JR1 was a different Ford, that he didn't have the uncontrollable rage of some of his fellow Ford political beings.
. . . .
But on Friday many came to realize what I already knew: that Harold Ford Jr. is no different than any other hot headed Ford. His invasion of Bob Corker's press conference was tacky, rude, and crossed the line of political etiquette. Ford appears to be very desperate, and now his true colors are showing.
. . . .
Ford had had several rallies around South Memphis on Friday and Corker didn't make an appearance, but barely did anyone else. At Ford and Third even with Harold Ford Sr. directing traffic and trying to get people to stop and listen to his son, very few stopped. They continued up to Belz and Third and the very same thing happened.

Read the rest from the marvelous Thaddeus Matthews at this link. I know the family too, Thad. Let's hope the rest of Tennessee gets to know them as well as we do, before it's too late!

Electronic Voting Machine Insecurities

I ran across an interesting paper, "Analysis of an Electronic Voting System," published in a 2004 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. I couldn't remember exactly what IEEE stands for, so I looked that up:
The IEEE, a non-profit organization, is the world's leading professional association for the advancement of technology.

The full name of the IEEE is the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., although the organization is referred to by the letters I-E-E-E and pronounced Eye-triple-E.

The paper finds serious security flaws in the Diebold AccuVote-TS voting machine, concluding:

[T]his voting system is unsuitable for use in a general election. Any paperless electronic voting system might suffer similar flaws, despite any "certification" it could have otherwise received. We suggest that the best solutions are voting systems having a "voter-verifiable audit trail," where a computerized voting system might print a paper ballot that can be read and verified by the voter.

Yikes! I rushed to the Shelby County Election Commission site to see what voting machines we use here now. Gasp! From the title of the online demo window that appears when you click the "Try out the NEW Voting Machines" link, it appears we use the AccuVoteTSX machine. Is this a new "X" model that fixes all the problems noted in the IEEE paper? I have to doubt it. This is a new technology. Windows XP has been out for years, and you know they still find security problems with XP almost every month. Does the TSX generate a voter-verifiable audit trail? The machine I used in early voting August 3rd sure didn't appear to.

We need to demand maximum progress at maximum speed, from the industry and our public officials, to assure security in this new voting technology.

I'm going to scan the whole IEEE paper here.

UPDATE: Problems Plague Election Administrators.

US Supreme Court on Voter Fraud

Rick Hasen's Election Law blog brings us this "Breaking News: U.S. Supreme Court Reverses Ninth Circuit Order Barring Arizona Voter ID Law" and provides a link to the Per Curiam opinion (6-page .pdf).
Confidence in the integrity of our electoral processes is essential to the functioning of our participatory democracy. Voter fraud drives honest citizens out of the democratic process and breeds distrust of our government. Voters who fear their legitimate votes will be outweighed by fraudulent ones will feel disenfranchised.
Slip Op. at 3. You can read the whole thing at the link above.

Saturday, October 21, 2006

Harold Ford Jr. in the Tank


John Harvey is back from a hunting trip and is applying his perspectives to the developments he's missed the last few days.

I think this image is too funny. Go on over to John's and read his latest!

Friday, October 20, 2006

Theft & Vandalism of Campaign Signs

No decent person would steal or vandalize a campaign sign from or on someone else's property. Yet, every election season, we hear this is happening.

I believe these general state statutes apply in Tennessee:

39-14-103. Theft of property.

A person commits theft of property if, with intent to deprive the owner of property, the person knowingly obtains or exercises control over the property without the owner's effective consent.

39-14-408. Vandalism.

(a) Any person who knowingly causes damage to or the destruction of any real or personal property of another or of the state, the United States, any county, city, or town knowing that the person does not have the owner's effective consent is guilty of an offense under this section.
(b) For the purposes of this section:
(1) "Damage" includes, but is not limited to:
(A) Destroying, polluting or contaminating property; or
(B) Tampering with property and causing pecuniary loss or substantial inconvenience to the owner or a third person; and
. . . .
(c) Acts of vandalism are to be valued according to the provisions of § 39-11-106(a)(36) and punished as theft under § 39-14-105.

39-14-105. Grading of theft.

Theft of property or services is:
(1) A Class A misdemeanor if the value of the property or services obtained is five hundred dollars ($500) or less;
(2) A Class E felony if the value of the property or services obtained is more than five hundred dollars ($500) but less than one thousand dollars ($1,000);
(3) A Class D felony if the value of the property or services obtained is one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more but less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000);
(4) A Class C felony if the value of the property or services obtained is ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or more but less than sixty thousand dollars ($60,000); and
(5) A Class B felony if the value of the property or services obtained is sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) or more.

39-11-106. Title definitions.

(a) The following definitions apply in this title, unless the context requires otherwise:
. . . .
(36) "Value":
(A) Subject to the additional criteria of subdivisions (a)(36)(B)-(D), "value" under this title is:
(i) The fair market value of the property or service at the time and place of the offense; or
(ii) If the fair market value of the property cannot be ascertained, the cost of replacing the property within a reasonable time after the offense;
. . . .
(C) If property or service has value that cannot be ascertained by the criteria set forth in subdivisions (a)(36)(A) and (B), the property or service is deemed to have a value of less than fifty dollars ($50.00)....

40-35-111. Authorized terms of imprisonment and fines for felonies and misdemeanors.
. . . .
(d) A sentence for a misdemeanor is a determinate sentence.
(e) The authorized terms of imprisonment and fines for misdemeanors are:
(1) Class A misdemeanor, not greater than eleven (11) months twenty-nine (29) days or a fine not to exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or both, unless otherwise provided by statute....

If you see anyone stealing or vandalizing yard signs, please call 911 to report a Class A misdemeanor to the Police; and take pictures or videos if you can, even if it just with your cell phone. Keep those pictures or videos for further instructions from the Police or the District Attorney. If you wish, you may send them to me at the email address in the sidebar, along with a description of the events and how authorities can best reach you. It's incumbent upon every citizen to do his or her duty to help ensure honest, thug-free campaigns and elections.

Thursday, October 19, 2006

All in the (Ford) Family

Ace reporter Marc Perrusquia of the Memphis Commercial Appeal brings us this:
For decades John Ford was a feared and powerful force in Tennessee, yet these days he plays more the role of wayward uncle to nephew and U.S. Senate candidate Harold Ford Jr.

Under indictment for bribery and facing more legal woes for his years of womanizing, John Ford was back in Juvenile Court on Tuesday, battling a North Carolina woman's demand for more child support.
. . . .
His lawyer argued that while Ford had fallen $50,000 behind on his child support, he deserves a break because of the "extraordinary circumstances'' brought on by his criminal prosecution.

For his part, Ford, 64, declined to talk about the case.

"Don't harass me. No comment means no comment,'' Ford said after the hearing, calling over a deputy who used a Juvenile Court vehicle as a shield to separate the ex-lawmaker from reporters.

I remember standing in the hallway of the Legislative Plaza in Nashville one afternoon when John Ford physically attacked a camera crew trying to get a statement out of him. Steve Cohen and I went to a nearby television shortly thereafter and watched coverage of the incident on a local station, shaking our heads in dismay.

But if you get elected based on an obsolete blind loyalty to the Ford name, you can pretty much do whatever you want to, huh? Until the feds bust you, anyway.

John punched me in the ribs once, just for a joke, right? John's got a pretty hard fist, or at least he did those 20-some-odd years ago. More from Perrusquia's story:

The Ford family tree has become a subplot in Democrat Harold Ford Jr.'s tight and heated race with Republican Bob Corker....

In a debate this month in Memphis, Corker referred to the many members of the Ford family in public office, asserting that his opponent, a congressman from Memphis, is part of a "Ford political machine.'' Ford responded, "Let's stick to you and I...."

Groan. It should have been,"to you and me," Harold. You do this over and over again. This is what grammarians call overrefinement:

Between you and I or between you and me?
According to The Oxford Dictionary of American Usage and Style, "Because the pronouns following between are objects of the preposition, the correct phrase is between you and me. Yet the phrasing between you and I is appallingly common--'a grammatical error of unsurpassable grossness,' as one commentator puts it. The Careful Writer notes that "Most of those who say or write between you and I, Shakespeare excepted, are guilty of overrefinement. They have been corrected when they used 'It is me' or 'You and me ought to get together,' and have become gun-shy about the word 'me.' In addition they are confused because the word 'you' is the same in the objective case as it is in the nominative; therefore, although they would not dream of saying or writing between him and they or between her and we or between us and she, the phrase between you and I does not sound bad to them. But bad it is, and indefensible grammatically. Between is a preposition and it is followed by the objective case: me. To say between you and I is a needless, pointless, and ignorant exception to a good rule".

To tell you the truth, I got a little worried for Republican Congresswoman Jean Schmidt when Harold Ford, Jr., ran yelling down the aisle toward her during her "John Murtha is a coward" speech.

Now it seems Jake Ford is made of the same cloth, as Jackson Baker and Chris Davis chronicled recently.

It's gotten so bad that even cousin Joe Ford, Jr. -- the real shining light in this generation of Fords whom we're just getting to know around here -- has blogged about Jake and about a member of Jake's posse, one Tyrone.

If you really want a Ford to vote for, I personally recommend Joe, Jr. I've observed him, met him, and talked with him. He's smart, enlightened in his world view, and gentlemanly. He's also a real lawyer, licensed in California (and their bar exam is one of the hardest). Joe, Jr., is the real Barack Obama of the Ford family -- not Harold, Jr.

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

There can be only one (1) residence

The sentence I titled this post with is from Tennessee Code section 2-2-122. Principles for determination of residence - Factors involved.

But before I get into more statutory detail, I want to make some general observations about where we are in Tennessee -- and the rest of the nation for that matter -- when it comes to the integrity of our elections.

It appears that, in attempts to cure alleged violations of voting rights, the Congress has passed several acts to regulate practices in the states, not just the National Voting Rights Act of 1965, but also the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (Motor Voter). Such statutes and federal lawsuits brought under them have forced states to amend their election laws to make voter registration and retention easier.

An unfortunate side effect of this trend, however, is that previously used methods of purging the rolls -- alleged to have been misused to scrub certain types of voters -- have not been replaced with list maintenance effective enough to answer emergent public concerns over newly alleged improprieties: such as voting in the name of dead people and voting outside the district of one's true residence.

Combined with new concerns raised by the increasing computerization of voting and calculation of election results -- also increased by federal legislation promoting the introduction of new voting machines -- fresh controversies have arisen, as shown in Shelby County by two recent proceedings: one in federal court to have the county's new voting machines declared unreliable; and the other in state court to have the results of four close county elections declared invalid because of alleged irregularities in registration and in processing votes.

It is slightly ironic but a sign of the increasing political health of Shelby County that complaints about out-of-county voting were brought by four candidates who are members of one of the groups, African-Americans, that new developments in the law were meant to protect. In a welcome development, those candidates have expressed an intention to push for more accurate maintenance of the voter rolls in Tennessee.

Now back to Harold Ford, Sr. I stated an initial opinion in an earlier post that -- based only on public records and public reports of Senior's whereabouts in recent years, until this election, when he again injected himself as a public figure into Memphis politics -- it seemed to me that Harold's Miami residence was primary and his Memphis house secondary. More information could prove my initial opinion wrong; so be it. But I thought it might draw public interest to the need to clarify our laws and invest more effort in ensuring the integrity of our elections.

I'll summarize a few points for you and give you links to read the statutes for yourself.
2-2-102. Qualified voter.

A citizen of the United States eighteen (18) years of age or older who is a resident of this state is a qualified voter unless the citizen is disqualified under the provisions of this title or under a judgment of infamy pursuant to § 40-20-112. (emphasis added)

This obvious but key provision simply means you have to reside in Tennessee to vote in Tennessee. 2-2-122's provision that "there can be only one (1) residence" must be read together with the other parts of that statute, which for your convenience I will quote in full:

2-2-122. Principles for determination of residence - Factors involved.

(a) The determination of whether a person is a resident or where the person resides or has residence for purposes of the election code shall be made in the light of the following principles:
(1) The residence of a person is that place in which the person's habitation is fixed, and to which, whenever the person is absent, the person has a definite intention to return; provided, that a person may not register to vote using a business location as the registration address when the sole basis for the person's presence at such location is based on a business or commercial use;
(2) A change of residence is generally made only by the act of removal joined with the intent to remain in another place. There can be only one (1) residence;
(3) A person does not become a resident of a place solely by intending to make it the person's residence. There must be appropriate action consistent with the intention;
(4) A person does not lose residence if, with the definite intention of returning, the person leaves home and goes to another country, state or place within this state for temporary purposes, even if of one or more years duration;
(5) The place where a married person's spouse and family have their habitation is presumed to be the person's place of residence, but a married person who takes up or continues abode with the intention of remaining at a place other than where the person's family resides is a resident where the person abides;
(6) A person may be a resident of a place regardless of the nature of the person's habitation, whether house or apartment, mobile home or public institution, owned or rented; however, a commercial address may not be used for residential purposes, unless the applicant provides evidence of such applicant's residential use of such address;
(7) A person does not gain or lose residence solely by reason of the person's presence or absence while employed in the service of the United States or of this state, or while a student at an institution of learning, or while kept in an institution at public expense, or while confined in a public prison or while living on a military reservation; and
(8) No member of the armed forces of the United States, or such member's spouse or dependent, is a resident of this state solely by reason of being stationed in this state.

(b) (1) The following factors, among other relevant matters, may be considered in the determination of where a person is a resident:
(A) The person's possession, acquisition or surrender of inhabitable property;
(B) Location of the person's occupation;
(C) Place of licensing or registration of the person's personal property;
(D) Place of payment of taxes which are governed by residence;
(E) Purpose of the person's presence in a particular place; and
(F) Place of the person's licensing for activities such as driving.

(2) In determining the residency of a person involuntarily confined in a state institution, the mere anticipation of a future grant of living quarters in a specific half-way house shall not be sufficient to establish intent to reside in such half-way house following release from the institution.

(c) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision in this chapter to the contrary, whenever county boundary lines cross through a farm being operated as a single unit, leaving such farm in two (2) separate counties, persons residing on such farms may make a one-time election to register to vote in either county. The administrator of elections shall place a person who chooses to register in the county which adjoins the physical location of the person's residence in the precinct where the property in the adjoining county is located.
(2) For the purpose of this subsection (c), "farm" means a tract of land of at least fifteen (15) acres constituting a farm unit engaged in the production of growing crops, plants, animals, nursery or floral products. Such farm shall produce gross agricultural income averaging at least one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) per year over a three-year period.
Other relevant statutes are:

2-2-106. Acts purging registration - Notice.

2-2-132. Purging of permanent registration records.

2-19-107. Illegal registration or voting.

2-19-109. False entries on official registration or election documents - Penalties.

<--Part 1 of this series

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

Harold Ford Sr. Still Votes in Memphis

After the August 3, 2006, Tennessee State Primary and County General Elections, I went to the Shelby County Election Commission and bought CD-ROMs, one with the complete results and the other with the list of people who voted, both a matter of public record.

I shared those two disks with my friend and local database wizard John Harvey, who did some number crunching and lookups for me, put some of the results online in a more easily accessible format, and created a lookup database from the Primary Voter List online at one of his sites, Voting in Memphis.

One night I remembered to look up whether Harold Ford, Sr., had indeed voted in Memphis in the August 3rd Primary. Here's what I found. Again, click the image to enalrge and mouseover until the full-size box appears in the lower right corner and click that if you need to:

Click to enlargeYou'll notice that Harold Ford Sr. did vote in the August 3rd election, voted in the Democratic Primary, and voted absentee.

Senior is the one with the 05/20/1945 birth date, which makes him 61 years old.

Underneath you can see Harold Jr. voted at his polling place. The "A" in the Status column means "Active" voter registration.

You can look names up yourself by clicking here.

I also looked up Michelle Roberts, co-owner of the 1039 Murray Hill Lane house here with Senior. It's the Michelle Roberts with the 07/25/1969 birth date, which makes her 37 years old. She voted in the August 3rd election absentee too.

I got curious about what Tennessee law says regarding residence for voting purposes and did some research. I'll share that tomorrow....

<--Part 1 / Part 6 of this series-->

Monday, October 16, 2006

Harold Ford Sr.'s Memphis Pied-A-Terre

pied-à-terre: Etymology: French, literally, foot to the ground : a temporary or second lodging

Well, I think that's what the Memphis house at 1039 Murray Hill Lane is, where Harold Sr. is still registered to vote.

I mean, why would I live in a place appraised at a mere $352,500, when I could luxuriate in a $2,500,000 place on exclusive Fisher Island with a golf course, marina, tennis courts, and multiple swimming pools, right off the coast of Miami, Florida?

I also noticed the "Owner Address" for property tax bills on the Shelby County Assessor's records was the same as for the Miami property: 7966 FISHER ISLAND DR, MIAMI BEACH, FL 33109. Here's a snapshot of part of the Assessor's records and a Google aerial map showing the location of the house, near Baptist Hospital East, off Humphreys Blvd., across the street from the house that Harold Sr. co-owns with his son "Sir" Isaac Ford at 1020 Murray Hill Lane, appraised a tad lower at only $311,900. (Click to enlarge, then hover mouse for full-size button lower right.)

Click to enlarge
Hey, who is this Michelle D. Roberts who co-owns the crib with Senior? I checked the Shelby County Register of Deeds to try to find out. I clicked on the View: GIS PARCEL MAP link on the Assessor's record for the property, which brought up another nice aerial map along with a listing of recent deeds conveying the property. I could have searched the Register's site at this link.

Anyway, it turns out she conveyed an undivided joint interest to herself and Harold on May 13, 2004, via this Quit Claim Deed (click on the "Image? View" link to see the deed as a .tif file). Couples who have married sometimes do this to create a joint tenancy with right of survivorship in property owned individually before marriage, similar to the tenancy by the entirety by which they would jointly own had they taken title together as married persons. But the deed recites that Ms. Roberts and Mr. Ford Sr. are both unmarried persons. Maybe they've married since then; I don't know. Do you?

While researching these properties, I came across a somewhat startling fact: both these houses, 1020 and 1039 Murray Hill Lane, are for sale right now, at the moment of this writing, by Sowell & Company Realtors, according to this live link to the listings, for $339,000 and $410,000, respectively! Hmmmm....

So another question occurred to me: Did Harold Ford, Sr., vote in the August 3, 2006, State Primary and County General Election here in Memphis??!!

Come back tomorrow and find out....

<--Part 1 / Part 5 of this series-->

Sunday, October 15, 2006

Doesn't Harold Ford Live in Miami?

I mean, I've heard for years now that that's where Harold Ford, Sr., lives; and we've had a look at his $2,500,000 tropical paradise villa. Why wouldn't he live there as much as he could?

And I've heard he has driven a BMW with Florida plate X03 FEC (how ironic) around Memphis this fall trying to get TWO sons elected to Congress.

I checked the records at FundRace.org to see what was listed as his address when he gave money to John Kerry, presumably in 2004 (click to enlarge):

Click to enlarge
Well, looked to me like he lived in Miami at the Fisher Island address. I think 6060 Poplar, Memphis, is an office address. I couldn't find 335 Grove Hill Place, Memphis, in the Shelby County Assessor's records; but perhaps you can track that down.

Then I thought, "I wonder if he's still registered to vote in Memphis," so I looked him up on John Harvey's live database that uses very recent election data. I was shocked to find this (click to enlarge):

Click to enlarge
Sure looked like Harold Ford, Sr., there on top, at some 1039 Murray Hill Lane address in Memphis, still registered to vote here! Also looked like Harold Ford, Jr., right beneath him; and the birth dates looked about right. So I decided to look into whether this could really be the same Harold Ford, Sr.

I'll bring you the results of that investigation tomorrow.

<--Part 1 / Part 4 of this series-->

Married? You're a Minority Now

Married couples, whose numbers have been declining for decades as a proportion of American households, have finally slipped into a minority, according to an analysis of new census figures by The New York Times.

The American Community Survey, released this month by the Census Bureau, found that 49.7 percent, or 55.2 million, of the nation’s 111.1 million households in 2005 were made up of married couples — with and without children — just shy of a majority and down from more than 52 percent five years earlier.
. . . .
“It just changes the social weight of marriage in the economy, in the work force, in sales of homes and rentals, and who manufacturers advertise to,” said Stephanie Coontz, director of public education for the Council on Contemporary Families, a nonprofit research group. “It certainly challenges the way we set up our work policies.”

While the number of single young adults and elderly widows are both growing, Professor Coontz said, “we have an anachronistic view as to what extent you can use marriage to organize the distribution and redistribution of benefits.”
. . . .
With more competition from other ways of living, the proportion of married couples has been shrinking for decades. In 1930, they accounted for about 84 percent of households. By 1990 the proportion of married couples had declined to about 56 percent.
. . . .
“It’s partially fueled by women in the work force; they don’t necessarily have to marry to be economically secure,” said Andrew A. Beveridge, a demographer at Queens College of the City University of New York, who conducted the census analysis for The New York Times. “You used to get married to have sex. Now one of the major reasons to get married is to have children, and the attractiveness of having children has declined for many people because of the cost.”

Read it all here. Single, divorced, and widowed people should demand their legislators revisit the discrimination against them in the U.S. Tax Code. They're the new majority; and it's majority rule.

Saturday, October 14, 2006

2.5 Million Dollar Mansion

I promised to post the Miami-Dade County Assessor's valuation and what Harold Ford, Sr., paid for his mansion on Fisher Island, Miami, Florida; so here it is. Again, click the graphic to enlarge enough to read the detail on the report; but I'll point a few things out for you. Remember the full-size box appears in the lower right corner when you hover over the graphic.

Click to enlarge
In the data column on the left, note that Harold paid $1,450,000 for the property in March of 1999 and that the Assessor just now, seven years later, brought his tax assessment up to and above the 1999 purchase price, to $1,524,840. Also note that the adjusted square footage of the property is 2,530 sq. ft. and that the tax assessor's mailing address for the Miami property is to Harold Ford, 7966 Fisher Island Drive #1, Miami, Florida, the same as the property address itself.

Now some doubt arose in my mind that there had been so little appreciation in true market value over the seven years since Harold bought the property in 1999: only $74,000, or 5.1%, less than 1% per year. So I looked up some asking prices for Fisher Island homes currently on the market, at this link. It seems residences on Fisher Island the size of Harold's are listing for over $1,000 to over $1,100 per square foot. List prices are not sale prices; but it seems safe to say that, at 2,530 sq. ft., Harold's tropical paradise is worth at least $2,500,000.

I also looked up some interesting facts about Fisher Island here:
Fisher Island is a 216-acre private island residential community of unrivaled luxury and splendor.
and here:
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Fisher Island had the highest per capita income of any place in the United States in 2000.
. . . .
Although no longer a one-family island, in 2005, Fisher Island still remains somewhat inaccessible to the public and uninvited guests and exclusive by modern standards as it was in the days of the Vanderbilts, providing similar refuge and retreat for its residents. The island contains mansions, a hotel, and a country club. Boris Becker and Mel Brooks are among the celebrities with homes on the island.
. . . .
The racial makeup of the CDP [census-designated place] was 92.08% White....

Check back tomorrow for more information about Harold's lifestyle. I promise you, I've got more really interesting stuff.

<--Part 1 / Part 3 of this series-->

Criminal Procedure for Reporters

I don't often hear the hard questions being asked by reporters when it comes to the details of arrests not followed by convictions, so in the public interest I will write a brief Wintermute's Notes on this important subject, for Tennessee. Other jurisdictions may vary.

A street, or warrantless, arrest -- if the police decide to follow through with charges -- is followed shortly by a formal charging instrument in which the officer recites his or her reasons giving rise to probable cause for the arrest, in an Affidavit of Complaint to a Magistrate, either a Judge of a court with criminal jurisdiction or a Judicial Commissioner. If the Magistrate agrees there is probable cause, the Magistrate signs a formal Arrest Warrant, even though the arrestee is already in custody, often as an entry on the Affidavit of Complaint form.

Or the police -- after an investigation giving rise to probable cause that a person out of custody has committed a crime -- can present such an affidavit to a Magistrate seeking an Arrest Warrant for the alleged offender. A citizen can be the initiator of such a police investigation, and can even present the case directly to the Magistrate under Tennessee law, in which last case a Criminal Summons to appear in court will be served on the alleged offender; but that is beyond the scope of these Notes.

Lastly, a Grand Jury can listen to evidence presented to it by a prosecutor, even a citizen acting on his or her own, and return an Indictment finding probable cause that a crime was committed and that the person named in the Indictment is the offender. In that event, a Criminal (in some large counties) or Circuit Court Judge will sign a Capias arrest warrant for the alleged offender.

Unless the defendant was already indicted by a Grand Jury, a defendant has the constitutional right to be brought promptly before a Judge with criminal jurisdiction (or in the federal system, a Magistrate Judge) for a hearing to decide whether probable cause exists to continue the case against the defendant and send it to the Grand Jury.

How does a person who has been through any of these processes wind up not convicted of an offense?

The District Attorney's office, sometimes in consultation with the police and/or alleged victims, can decide to nolle prosequi, or "decline to prosecute" the case, in which event the defendant is entitled to free expungement of the court and arrest records of the case.

The Judge can grant a Motion to Dismiss the case, for lack of prosecution -- usually in the case of a missing witness or witnesses -- when the District Attorney does not want to move forward with the case, or when the Judge -- after a Preliminary Examination of the case, or after a successful defense Motion to Suppress Evidence -- decides that the prosecution does not have enough evidence to convict the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt in the eyes of that Judge.

How else might a person get "dismissal" of an offense for which he or she was arrested?

Tennessee has two statutory forms of diversion: pre-trial and judicial.

Tennessee's court system has decided that pre-trial diversion is only available when the defendant is before a criminal court of record, where the defendant must apply to the District Attorney to have prosecution suspended for a fixed period, during which the defendant must comply with any conditions in a written agreement, at the end of which time the charges will be dismissed, without the defendant ever having to plead guilty.

Some District Attorneys use a common law form of pre-trial diversion wherein if the defendant is not arrested for another offense for some period, often a year, the DA will move to dismiss the case.

Judicial diversion requires that the defendant plead or be found guilty, after which the defendant can make a request (which the District Attorney can object to, join in, or take no position on, either by advance agreement or not) that the judge suspend entry of the judgment of guilt and place the defendant on a special form of probation. After successful completion of such term of special probation, the guilty plea or finding of guilt will be set aside and the charges dismissed with prejudice.

The defendant again gains the right to expungement of the public records of his or her case, although in the case of statutory diversion the defendant must pay a fee for the expungement. Also in the case of either statutory form of diversion, pre-trial or judicial, the fact of diversion must be sent by the court clerk to the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, so that prosecutors will know that the defendant is ineligible for diversion again in this state. In any case, the police and District Attorney are entitled to retain their records of the case -- but for future law enforcement purposes only, not for public inspection.

Of course, the defendant might have been found not guilty after a trial, either at the General Sessions or Criminal/Circuit Court level and therefore entitled to free expungement of court and arrest records on those charges.

In the case of a former arrestee alleging that his or her prosecutions were dismissed or that he or she was found not guilty, the followup questions should be, with regard to each and every case:

(1) In what year and location was the arrest and for what charge or charges, exactly?

(2) In what court in what federal district, state, county, or city was the case heard and/or tried?

(3) Was the case nolle prosequi (usually heard as "null prahst") by the District Attorney, or did the Judge dismiss the case for lack of prosecution or insufficient evidence, or were you granted diversion on the case, and if diversion, was it pre-trial or judicial diversion, or were you found not guilty after a trial?

If the former arrestee pleads ignorance to any of these questions, or to verify any answers, ask if he or she will supply details immediately, including the names of any attorneys representing him or her in each case, written waivers of attorney-client privilege regarding each case, and written waivers of any juvenile court privacy rights that may apply.

If any Tennessee reporters email me for citations to authorities or with general questions on this topic, I will do my best to respond with links and answers.

How to Overcome Nymphomania

OK, that one fake book cover is pretty good; but the rest in a FoxNews story about an Ottawa couple selling these things for $6 aren't so hot.

I know my readers can do better, so let's have a contest in the comments. You can probably get CafePress to start printing these too, just in time for Christmas presents. Save the link to this post and come on back when you get a brainstorm.

West TN Liberals Getting Mad at Fords

David Holt doesn't hide the fact that he is Third Vice Chair of the Shelby County Democratic Party, so consider the source when you read his recent post:
I repeat my previous assertion that if Jake is getting stomped then I will vote to take back the Senate. If Ford for the sake of Ford has a chance of winning, then screw the Senate. My city comes first and the corrupt-race-baiting-I'm-entitled-to-a-political-seat-because-of-my-last-name family can all go to hell. I'll vote against whichever of them happen to be on the ballot. I have spoken to Jake twice now. I think the guy is truly unstable. The idea of Sr. and company trying to shove this down my throat enrages me. I want the Senate bad, but if it takes losing the Senate to save the city, I'll do it.
We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming....

"Nice" to Hear Harold's Voice Again



I used to be friends with Harold Ford, Sr. I helped him in an important campaign for Congress. We had some good times together. I met the apple of his eye, Harold Ford, Jr., when Junior was just a bubbly kid.

When I heard Harold was back in Memphis telling preachers that Steve Cohen had never helped him, well, I couldn't believe that, because I was there during times Harold and Steve did help each other, supported each other, and did election day Ford Ballot handouts together. I bet Cohen still has some of those Ballots in a box somewhere -- he's such an election memento freak.

When I heard Senior told those preachers that Cohen had been campaign manager for one of his primary opponents in the past, Mark Flanagan, I asked another old hand, one of the men who found the "missing" ballot boxes that put Harold over the top against Kuykendall in 1974, to refresh my memory of that campaign. He reminded me of a story I had heard before: that there had been some discussion of asking Flanagan to withdraw, until Senior said something to the effect of, "No, leave him in; it'll help me raise money!"

Harold, old comrade-in-arms, I understand what you're trying to do here this fall, even though I oppose it; but I hope this post helps refresh your memory about these two allegations of yours against my friend Steve Cohen.

Thursday, October 12, 2006

Who's Got the Mansion?

Harold Ford, Jr. seems to be trying to make Tennessee voters resent Bob Corker by talking about some 30-room mansion Corker is supposed to have in Chattanooga.

For years now, though, I've been hearing about Harold Ford, Sr.'s place in Miami, Florida; so I thought I'd look into that. Here's an aerial photograph of Sr.'s oceanfront home on the beach in Miami. Click on the pic to enlarge, hover over the new image until the show-full-size icon comes up in the lower right corner, and then click that.

Click to enlarge
Look at the multiple swimming pools, the golf course, the tennis courts, the pure white beach, and the gorgeous azure sea! I'm told Harold Sr. has two of these condominiums joined together and that the home is really nice.

I wondered what an incredible place like this was worth, so I looked up his address in the Miami-Dade County Assessor's Office and found out the recorded price he paid for the property in 1999 and its 2006 market value for assessment purposes.

Come on back tomorrow and I'll share those figures with you and another interesting fact.

UPDATE: The Memphis Commercial Appeal finally picked this story up a year later.

Following a report in The Commercial Appeal Wednesday that questioned his eligibility to vote in Memphis, former congressman Harold Ford Sr. said he has hired lawyers to advise him whether he was entitled to cast an early ballot Sept. 27.

John Harvey and I could stand a little credit from the daily paper. I estimated the value of the property at 2.5 million. Still, I'm glad the Commercial put its resources into further investigation of this matter.

Part 2 of this series-->

Tuesday, October 10, 2006

Frommer's® Does Memphis

As part of her "24-Hour Layover" series on MSNBC.com, Pauline Frommer helps me remember why I stick around here:
Magnificent Memphis
Discover the home of the blues and the birthplace of rock ‘n’ roll – there’s nowhere on earth quite like Memphis.

Here's the starting page on MSNBC; and here's the Frommer's® guide to Memphis.

Friday, October 06, 2006

Blood Borders

Deliverance Jr., Christopher Dickey, hipped me to a piece in the Armed Forces Journal, "Blood borders: How a better Middle East would look," that is making big waves in foreign policy communities worldwide. Here's a peep at the map (click to enlarge):

Click to enlarge

MySpace Grows Up

Youths no longer predominant at MySpace
Half of social networking site's users are 35 or older

Well, well, well ... I'm in that older half myself. What's going on? I guess people got tired of those dating and hookup sites that want you to buy credits or pay monthly fees to be able to express interest in other members, that tend to perpetuate sexual imbalance in "Who pays?" Haha, now advertisers pay; it's the great American way. Here are the new stats:
Only 30 percent are under 25 despite a common belief that the site is mostly populated with kids and young adults.

Just a year ago, teens under 18 made up about 25 percent of MySpace, the popular online hangout run by News Corp. That's now down to 12 percent in the comScore analysis released Thursday.

By contrast, the 35-54 group at MySpace grew to 41 percent in August, from 32 percent a year earlier.

That's called life after puberty, kiddies. Matter of fact, I've got a comment to respond to from a lovely lady right now. No, not one of those "friend requests" from webcam ho's. However, I can't figure how I got picked to receive this email:

Hi Wintermute,You have been invited to join the lesbian webcam show for all group on MySpace. Click the link below to see the group:
http://groups.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=groups.groupProfile&groupID=104037645

Well damn, I mean, I like to do at least one thing lesbians like to do; but do I get to show on cam or not? I must go find out....

UPDATE: Ratz, mo' webcam ho's. In one previous life as a world-class cyberstud, I got shows, phone sex, and even motel meetups for free. Sorry, girls; I ain't payin' for cybersex.

A Woman's Skin Ages Faster

To enhance my popularity with female readers, I bring your attention to this article on LiveScience:
Men become more distinguished as they age and women, well, we just keep getting older. And if this isn't bad enough, a new study shows that the female skin actually starts to age faster than the hides of men.

Using a new laser imaging technique, researchers looked at the deeper layers of the skin and measure the amount of damage from sun exposure and aging. The imaging of collagen and elastin, whose degeneration causes wrinkles and loss of smoothness, revealed that women lose collagen faster than men.

I could go into some possible reasons for sex-differential aging, but I've already blogged enough here to summon the Harpies.

Another Ford Joke?

In an article titled "Ford called self a lawyer but did not pass bar exam," Chattanooga Times Free Press staff writer Michael Davis informs us:
Democratic U.S. Senate hopeful Harold Ford Jr. referred to himself as a lawyer earlier this week, but the congressman has not passed the bar exam.

Michael Powell, senior adviser to the Ford campaign, said U.S. Rep. Ford took the Tennessee bar exam in February 1997 and failed.
. . . .
Mr. Powell said it is his understanding that Rep. Ford was joking when he made reference to being a lawyer during Tuesday’s meeting.
Yeah, right.
Mr. Powell said the GOP is finding "petty" things to talk about.

"We’re a month out from the election, and the Republicans and Mr. Corker still are not talking about the issues," he said.

Not so fast, flackey.

Tennesseans have usually sent lawyers to the United States Senate -- real lawyers, admitted to the Tennessee bar.

Go to Wikipedia's marvelous list of Tennessee's Senators throughout our state's history. Click on the names and again and again you will see facts like "He received a J.D. degree from Vanderbilt University Law School in 1967. He was admitted to the Tennessee bar in 1967...." That's from former Senator Fred Thompson's Wiki bio; Fred even plays a lawyer on TV!

Estes Kefauver, Albert Gore, Sr., Howard Baker, Jim Sasser, Lamar Alexander -- all lawyers admitted to the Tennessee bar, practicing Tennessee lawyers, with achievements in their legal careers.

Why does Harold Ford, Jr., get a pass on this? I know too many smart, honest, competent lawyers and judges of African descent, who passed the Tennessee bar exam, to cut him any slack just for being black.

To me, this is an issue; but then, I am a Tennessee lawyer. I don't just play one on TV ... or in front of newspaper editorial boards. Just a joke, Ford? Or the sign of a great pretender? Yes! That's this post's soundtrack!


UPDATE: Read this Tennessee law:

39-16-302. Impersonation of licensed professional.

(a) It is unlawful for any person who is not licensed to do so, to practice or pretend to be licensed to practice a profession for which a license certifying the qualifications of such licensee to practice the profession is required.

(b) A violation of this section is a Class E felony.

[Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1.] (emphases added)

Then watch these videos:




These statements to Wolf Blitzer likely didn't take place in Tennessee; but other jurisdictions have similar statutes. The statements were broadcast or cablecast into Tennessee, though; and the "joke" in front of the Chattanooga Times Free Press editorial board presumably was made in Tennessee.

UPDATE: It appears the Tennessee Republican Party floated this campaign ad on YouTube:



UPDATE: The Corker campaign brings this back up, with a kicker.

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Libertarian Democrats

Cato Unbound is running another one of those lead essay/response essay things featuring Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas making a case for the emergence of Libertarian Democrats in today's political atmosphere. Check it out.

UPDATE: One of the smart posters at The Volokh Conspiracy has a riposte.